EU’s Carbon Border Taxes and Joe Biden’s Clean Energy plans: A double threat for developing countries — Watts Up With That?

The introduction of the European Union’s Carbon Border Taxes and Joe Biden’s announcement of Clean Energy plans has raised double alarm in developing countries.

EU’s Carbon Border Taxes and Joe Biden’s Clean Energy plans: A double threat for developing countries — Watts Up With That?

Climate adaptation follies. Part II: scenarios of future sea level rise — Climate Etc.

by Judith Curry How did the state of New Jersey come to adopt sea level rise projections for their adaptation planning that are more than twice as high as the IPCC’s values? Part I introduced the challenges facing New Jersey associated with sea level rise, and their general adaptation strategy.  Their adaptation strategy is driven […]

Climate adaptation follies. Part II: scenarios of future sea level rise — Climate Etc.

Climate adaptation follies. Part I: The New Jersey challenge — Climate Etc.

by Judith Curry New Jersey has a sea level rise problem.  How should this be managed? New Jersey’s peninsular geography makes it especially vulnerable to sea level rise. The problem Sea level is rising along the New Jersey coast, at a rate substantially higher than the global average.  Here is the data for Atlantic City, […]

Climate adaptation follies. Part I: The New Jersey challenge — Climate Etc.

Absolute Proof of Election Fraud

Image copied from Rumble for Absolute Proof video by Mike Lindell

Use the link below to see Mike Lindell’s video “Absolute Proof” on Rumble.com. It demonstrates voting fraud/ theft through voting machines with foreign interference via the internet. He presents forensic evidence and experts that can attest that votes were flipped or manipulated. The video is almost 2 hours long but well worth the time. Other irregularities such as changing voting regulations without legislation, vote harvesting, ballot stuffing, backdating and failure to verify signatures of mail in ballots,, etc. are not included here.

Help Stop the Unconstitutional Impeachment Trial

Please contact ALL of the Republican senators and urge them to vote to dismiss the impeachment trial in the Senate because it is unconstitutional. Please also urge the Senators to vote to acquit if the motion to dismiss fails.

It is not enough to contact our own senators; we need to flood the contacts of ALL of the senators with pleas to stop this travesty. See attached updated contact list of all Republican Senators in the 117th Congress.

The Senate does not have the authority to adjudicate against a private citizen. It only has the power to conduct an impeachment trial to remove a sitting president. They cannot lawfully impeach a former president once he/she leaves office and becomes a private citizen. If charges are called for, then the Justice Department is the place for a criminal or civil investigation, indictment and trial.

The updated contact list file has links for website, email, Facebook and Twitter, and contact information for mailing addresses and phone numbers.  Feel free to copy, save and share the file.  Email takes a little longer to do than Facebook or Twitter or phoning, because each senator has a contact form you will need to fill out first.  Also note that Twitter has a limit on the words/letters you can use. I suggest you create a short narrative organize your thoughts and plug it into messages for each senator.

NOTE: These files can be a tool for contacting senators in the future for other issues and I would encourage you to get involved on important matters. I have also included an updated contact list file for Republican House members. (The reason for the update is that some of the members did not have their permanent Washington office, email, phone, etc. when I sent the earlier version.)

Updated Repub Senators contact info of 117th Congress

Updated Repub House reps contact info of 117th Congress

 

Climate Researcher’s New E-Book: IPCC Significantly Overstates CO2, “The Sorry State Of Climate Science” — Watts Up With That?

According to Poyet, a geologist, the worse climate predictions have been made for 50 years and none of them has ever become true. For example, despite the unsupported claims that the Maldives islands would be submerged by 2050, 97% of them have grown so far, for various reasons having nothing to do with “climate change”.

Climate Researcher’s New E-Book: IPCC Significantly Overstates CO2, “The Sorry State Of Climate Science” — Watts Up With That?

Kamala Harris is ineligible to be Vice President

by Kay Kiser, 11/14/2020

Kamala Harris is ineligible to be President because she is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by the Constitution. As such, she is also ineligible to run for Vice President. Here’s why.

Father: Donald J. Harris, a Jamaican American, arrived at the University of California, Berkeley on a colonial (UK) Jamaican government scholarship in the fall of 1961. According to Wikipedia, in the fall of 1962, he spoke at a meeting of the Afro American Association—a students’ group at Berkeley whose members would go on to establish the discipline of Black studies, propose the holiday of Kwanzaa, and help form the Black Panther Party.  He graduated from Berkeley in 1966 with a PhD in Economics. Quoting from Wikipedia: “Harris’s economic philosophy was critical of mainstream economics and questioned orthodox assumptions; he was once described as a ‘Marxist scholar’ and said to be ‘too charismatic, a pied piper leading students astray from neo-Classical economics’”[1] and “He eventually became a naturalized United States citizen.”

Mother: Shyamala Gopalan, from India, a United Kingdom colony, graduated from Berkeley in Jan. of 1964 with a PhD in Nutrition and Endocrinology.

Kamala was born Oct. 20, 1964 in Oakland, California, making her a citizen at birth, although apparently both parents were noncitizens on student visas at the time.

To hold the office of president, you must be a “natural born citizen,” not just a citizen.

Constitution, Article II, Section 1, part 5: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained the Age of 35 Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

According to Lawrence B. Solum, Georgetown University Law Center, in a 2007 article Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause[2], “What was the original public meaning of the phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of its meaning. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a “natural born citizen.” According to a Harvard Law Review ForumCommentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement, On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen,”[3] The meaning of “natural born Citizen” in English common law and to the founders at the time of the writing of the Constitution is that both parents must be citizens of the United States, regardless of her birthplace. As a child of citizens of another country, the child is not a “natural born citizen.” In this case, her parents were citizens of the United Kingdom, since both Jamaica and India were at the time colonies of the UK. She is a citizen but not a “natural born citizen.”

Kamala Harris is not eligible to be President of the United States on these grounds because both parents were citizens of other countries on student visas at the time of her birth.

PS. This also applies to Barak Obama, but was ignored, over the protests of the opposition. That is, unless his real father was Frank Marshall Davis, a well-known Communist and friend of the family, and not Barak Obama Senior, a foreign student in need of an extended visa, as claimed.


[1] Barry, Ellen (August 21, 2020). “Kamala Harris’s father, a footnote in her speeches, is a prominent economist”The New York Times. Retrieved 24 August 2020.”

[2] 2007 Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause, Lawrence B. Solum Georgetown University Law Center, lbs32@law.georgetown.edu

[3] Harvard Law Review Forum,On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen,” Commentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement, MAR 11, 2015, 128 Harv. L. Rev. F. 161