Dominion Vote Tabulation Machine Testing Results and Overturning an Election
A test of one Dominion vote tabulating machine in Ware County, Georgia showed that the votes were skewed in favor of Biden. In the test equal numbers of votes were run through for each of the two candidates.
What emerged was not equal. It showed that the computer program in the machine gave Joe Biden 1.13 votes for each vote cast and gave Trump 0.87 votes for each vote cast. That is a spread of 26%, and is enough to overturn the election from Trump to Biden.
Technically, this is not vote flipping; it is adjusting the count by multiplying the votes by algorithmic ratios. Therefore, the left can say no votes were switched or taken from Trump and given to Biden. Rather this is mathematical inflation and deflation of votes to achieve the same result.
Using the AP official numbers from shortly after the election, I calculated what the outcome of each state would be if the ratios were 1.13 for Biden and 0.87 for Trump. By dividing the reported votes by these ratios to eliminate bias, Trump would win most states and the election by a large margin.
Test 1. If we assume that only the battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin were skewed, each of these states would be overturned from Biden to Trump. Trump would win 308 electoral votes to 223 for Biden in spite of the additional illegitimate votes brought in after the count was stopped.
Test 2. If we assume all states were involved, then in spite of the illegally added votes, Trump would win 340 electoral votes to 191 for Biden. This would include overturning Maine, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Virginia from Biden to Trump.
Either way, Trump would have won by a significant margin. See Test 1 and Test 2 in the table below.
Opinion: Because Trump’s lead in the battleground states was too great to overcome by using algorithmic factors to skew the vote count alone, the count was stopped and new batches of (illegitimate) votes were brought in to ensure that Biden would win. This appears to be what happened, especially in battleground states in large Democratically run cities.
Before this audit of the Dominion vote tabulating machine, I had done similar calculations using Sidney Powell’s proposed ratio of 1.25 for Biden and 0.75 for Trump with similar results. See Test 3 and Test 4 in the table below.
Full data is in the Excel spreadsheet at the end of this report. The data used in calculations is from AP 11/21/2020 online. To maintain accuracy standards, I checked the 12/7/2020 AP online results. Most results were so close as to be within tenths of a percent to a rounding error. The only significant change was for New York with a 4.2% increase for Joe Biden, which didn’t change the outcome.
|Raw Votes including disputed additional votes||232||306|
|Test 1: Adj. T/.87 and B/1.13 Battleground states only||315||223|
|Test 2 Adj T/.87 and B/1.13, all states||347||191|
|Test 3: Adj. T/.75 and B/1.25, Battleground states only||315||223|
|Test 4: Adj. T/.75 and B/1.25, all states||452||86|
Figure 1. Electoral Votes resulting from adjusting election votes to remove bias from suspected algorithmic ratios imposed by Dominion vote tabulating machines.
How many of the states, districts and machines used these ratios to skew the results?
What were the actual ratios used in each state and district?
Were Dominion machines recalibrated after the election to remove and hide the ratios used to skew the vote totals?
Because many of the Dominion vote tabulating machines have not been well secured, they may have been recalibrated to hide any skewing factors. If this is the case, we can’t test them in any meaningful way or know for certain what, if any, ratio was actually used.
Did the 2016 presidential election also use these ratios in the voting machines?
If so, the Democrats were so confident that it would be sufficient to elect Hillary Clinton that they were not prepared to create and count extra illegal votes to make up for the difference when Trump votes exceeded expectations. Perhaps that is why they were prepared to supply those extra (illegal) votes in 2020. It also explains why Hillary Clinton never accepted the results and was sure that Trump had cheated.
Could the same system have been used in the 2012 and 2008 elections? Other previous years? We may never know.
|2020 Presidential state-by-state election results. Data from AP|
|Note: original chart copied 11/21/20; is no longer available at this site|
|Adjustment to remove possible fraud through Dominion settings to favor Biden.|
|Candidate||Raw Votes||EVotes||Adjusted Votes||Adjusted EVotes|
|ALABAMA 100% precincts|
|ALASKA 100% precincts|
|ARIZONA 100% precincts|
|ARKANSAS 100% precincts|
|CALIFORNIA 97.4% precincts|
|COLORADO 100% precincts|
|CONNECTICUT 100% precincts|
|DELAWARE 100% precincts|
|DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 100% precincts|
|FLORIDA 100% precincts|
|GEORGIA 100% precincts|
|HAWAII 100% precincts|
|IDAHO 100% precincts|
|ILLINOIS 99.1% precincts|
|INDIANA 100% precincts|
|IOWA 100% precincts|
|KANSAS 100% precincts|
|KENTUCKY 100% precincts|
|LOUISIANA 100% precincts|
|MAINE 99.3% precincts|
|MARYLAND 100% precincts|
|MASSACHUSETTS 100% precincts|
|MICHIGAN 100% precincts|
|MINNESOTA 100% precincts|
|MISSISSIPPI 100% precincts|
|MISSOURI 100% precincts|
|MONTANA 100% precincts|
|NEBRASKA 100% precincts|
|NEVADA 100% precincts|
|NEW HAMPSHIRE 100% precincts|
|NEW JERSEY 100% precincts|
|NEW MEXICO 100% precincts|
|NEW YORK 100% precincts|
|NORTH CAROLINA 100% precincts|
|NORTH DAKOTA 100% precincts|
|OHIO 100% precincts|
|OKLAHOMA 100% precincts|
|OREGON 98.72% precincts|
|PENNSYLVANIA 99.93% precincts|
|RHODE ISLAND 100% precincts|
|SOUTH CAROLINA 100% precincts|
|SOUTH DAKOTA 100% precincts|
|TENNESSEE 100% precincts|
|TEXAS 100% precincts|
|UTAH 100% precincts|
|VERMONT 100% precincts|
|VIRGINIA 100% precincts|
|WASHINGTON 98.85% precincts|
|WEST VIRGINIA 100% precincts|
|WISCONSIN 100% precincts|
|WYOMING 100% precincts|