Where particle physics intersects with ‘climate science’ — JunkScience.com

While particle physicists aren’t trying to destroy our standard of living (as are “climate scientists”), this New York Times op-ed inadvertently points out the commonality between particle physics and “climate science”. Here you go: Read the NYTimes op-ed.

via Where particle physics intersects with ‘climate science’ — JunkScience.com

Avian Exodus: Loons Vacate Vast Tracts of North Sea To Escape Wind Turbines — STOP THESE THINGS

The wind industry’s rampant bird and bat slaughter is an inconvenient truth, to be sure. The wholesale slaughter of millions of birds and bats – includes rare, endangered and majestic species, like America’s iconic bald and golden eagles. The default response from the wind industry is to lie like fury and – when the corpses can no […]

via Avian Exodus: Loons Vacate Vast Tracts of North Sea To Escape Wind Turbines — STOP THESE THINGS

CLIMATISM : State Of The Climate Report

Great updated climate stats and data sets.

Climatism

CLIMATISM - State Of The Climate


THE global warming climate change scare has absolutely nothing to do with the environment or “Saving The Planet”. Rather, its roots lie in a misanthropic agenda engineered by the environmental movement of the mid 1970’s, who realised that doing something about claimed man-made “global warming” would play to quite a number of the Left’s social agendas.

IN THEIR (IPCC) OWN WORDS:

UN IPCC - Climate “Has Almost Nothing To Do With Environmental Policy.” | ClimatismUN IPCC : Climate “Has Almost Nothing To Do With Environmental Policy.” | Climatism

ENERGY rationing and the control of carbon dioxide, the direct byproduct of cheap, reliable hydrocarbon energy, has always been key to the Left’s Malthusian and misanthropic agenda of depopulation and deindustrialisation. A totalitarian ideology enforced through punitive emissions controls under the guise of “Saving The Planet”.

STANFORD University and The Royal Society’s resident global warming alarmist and population freak Paul R. Ehrlich spelled out in 1976 the Left’s anti-energy agenda that still underpins the current…

View original post 4,423 more words

Wind Power Chaos Reigns: Scots Build Diesel Generators & Brace For Week-Long Blackouts — STOP THESE THINGS

Let renewable energy zealots and other such ideologues anywhere near your power system and prepare for deadly chaos. Wind and solar ‘powered’ South Australians know what it is to do without power for days on end. Having experienced plenty of load shedding lasting for 5 hours or more, South Australians got a real taste of […]

via Wind Power Chaos Reigns: Scots Build Diesel Generators & Brace For Week-Long Blackouts — STOP THESE THINGS

How Can So Many Scientists Be So Wrong About The Pause? — NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood From GWPF: Using simple statistics it looked at and dismissed over 200 peer-reviewed papers that analysed the pause and concluded it was a real phenomenon. How did they, and the IPCC, get it all so wrong? Source: Clive Best Nobody who keeps an eye on climate research will be at […]

via How Can So Many Scientists Be So Wrong About The Pause? — NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

NOTE TO POLICY MAKERS : 41 Reasons Why Wind ‘Power’ Can Not Replace Fossil Fuels — Climatism

“Renewable energy technologies simply won’t work; we need a fundamentally different approach.” – Top Google engineers “We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That’s the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.” – Warren Buffett “Suggesting that renewables will let us phase rapidly off fossil fuels in the […]

via NOTE TO POLICY MAKERS : 41 Reasons Why Wind ‘Power’ Can Not Replace Fossil Fuels — Climatism

Staggering Cost: Offshore Wind Power 25 Times More Expensive Than Coal, Gas & Nuclear

STOP THESE THINGS

Wind power is utterly pointless on every level, having been abandoned centuries ago for pretty obvious reasons, starting with the weather.

The oft heard retort from those fighting the prospect of wind turbines being speared into their backyards, is “why don’t they put them offshore?” These are the characters who are simply too gutless to openly criticise renewables, lest they be attacked as “tin-foil hat wearing climate deniers”, “flat-earthers” and NIMBYS.

The last of those charges is well-deserved. The rest, though, is just the kind of mean-spirited denigration we’ve come to expect from members of the wind cult. There is no real logical argument to support wind power, so they’re reduced to ad hominem attacks on those who stand as obstacles to our purportedly ‘inevitable transition’ to an all wind and sun powered future. [Note to Ed: why don’t they simply ask them how that’s panned out in South Australia?]

View original post 864 more words